{"id":"W2057712820","doi":"10.1115/ipc2004-0239","title":"A Geomorphic Approach to the Design of Pipeline Crossings of Mountain Streams","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2004 International Pipeline Conference, Volumes 1, 2, and 3","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BGC Engineering (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Aggradation; STREAMS; Fluvial; Flood myth; Hazardous waste; Pipeline (software); Geology; Hydrology (agriculture); Process (computing); Debris flow; Return period; Environmental science; Debris; Computer science; Geomorphology; Geotechnical engineering; Engineering; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003379582,0.0001551669,0.0002073217,0.0000604109,0.00008778286,0.00005137753,0.000399109,0.00008811687,0.0005038257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006515298,0.0000998531,0.0000604232,0.0001820411,0.0003329061,0.0001181363,0.0001599885,0.0001424516,0.00004359215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006153248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000662175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001464029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008923222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987156,0.00003080942,0.0003920029,0.0002686702,0.0004043556,0.0001885821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994385,0.00002975719,0.0001606261,0.0001883399,0.00009570154,0.00008705926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001164966,0.002436621,0.05320448,0.0001369709,0.0003242087,0.00002279234,0.009046167,0.6982661,0.01878611,0.02322255,0.04573926,0.1476497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007822389,0.0007933457,0.03499818,0.0005190127,0.0002125976,0.000199165,0.001967521,0.8328868,0.008323872,0.02110829,0.08992483,0.001243952],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4477118,0.0003922193,0.518362,0.003074992,0.0003794004,0.0006943582,0.000172095,0.00004039629,0.02917271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905698,0.0001233642,0.004012317,0.0001959154,0.00008470244,0.00001158995,0.00003439199,0.0000108118,0.00495715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5428579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5516537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0149822866078003,"score_gpt":0.2296318447230669,"score_spread":0.2146495581152666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}