{"id":"W2057754632","doi":"10.1080/13504850500372992","title":"Finite sample effects of additive outliers on the Granger-causality test with an application to money growth and inflation in Peru","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics Letters","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Statistics Canada","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Outlier; Granger causality; Econometrics; Statistic; Causality (physics); Inflation (cosmology); Sample (material); Economics; Test statistic; Mathematics; Statistics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Thermodynamics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02918303,0.0005253853,0.001421109,0.001246771,0.001042876,0.001654344,0.00190965,0.001447729,0.002115784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23542,0.0005450678,0.001074881,0.001820518,0.003143764,0.002573403,0.002613649,0.003472151,0.0001452002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001249956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001192098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007334334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007315181,"domain_scores_codex":[0.987751,0.01050486,0.0002856936,0.0005954662,0.0005546175,0.0003083234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4138839,0.5662552,0.006164517,0.008589697,0.004235507,0.0008712156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006221422,0.0001665098,0.03638775,0.0001639896,0.0003173397,0.0008858123,0.0009770325,0.8385876,0.001229481,0.09423427,0.00123228,0.02519589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009634277,0.0001346168,0.002670195,0.00003592189,0.00008469485,0.000132657,0.0001383198,0.9431111,0.001037742,0.05215118,0.0003545698,0.00005262038],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6831442,0.00072676,0.3101111,0.001407728,0.00007394703,0.00009702549,0.0002906162,0.000414993,0.003733488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586784,0.0001576959,0.04040099,0.00008709515,0.00002640325,0.00008563356,0.0001247516,0.00006571497,0.0003732355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02918303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1543365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01776641896898361,"score_gpt":0.1923470809679988,"score_spread":0.1745806619990152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}