{"id":"W2057754632","doi":"10.1080/13504850500372992","title":"Finite sample effects of additive outliers on the Granger-causality test with an application to money growth and inflation in Peru","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics Letters","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Statistics Canada","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Outlier; Granger causality; Econometrics; Statistic; Causality (physics); Inflation (cosmology); Sample (material); Economics; Test statistic; Mathematics; Statistics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Thermodynamics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003627976,0.0002030898,0.0003612333,0.0002400364,0.00008196264,0.00004817842,0.000181218,0.00007377393,0.00002348196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001334885,0.0002017398,0.00003722556,0.0001120863,0.00009172086,0.00025058,0.00003109704,0.0001478117,0.0001003294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001327826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006447182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001008991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003460238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987212,0.00001398899,0.0004969305,0.0004653857,0.00001739133,0.0002851385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983227,0.0008764893,0.0003146481,0.000374905,0.000003658593,0.0001075775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000848549,0.0005709224,0.3500592,0.0001581666,0.0002852569,0.000001123461,0.01147928,0.2654017,0.001626974,0.3512751,0.001019617,0.01727408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003251783,0.0007259679,0.8816457,0.00005014117,0.00003611788,0.000002280451,0.0003153994,0.07989228,0.006659298,0.01961042,0.006411121,0.001399492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902165,0.00001576956,0.003279757,0.004244941,0.00003686805,0.000753676,0.0002781562,0.00001696312,0.00115735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917607,0.00006356538,0.001090705,0.006702221,0.0001086245,0.000184742,0.00005501321,0.00002886824,0.000005533332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5315865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8226711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01776641896898361,"score_gpt":0.1923470809679988,"score_spread":0.1745806619990152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}