{"id":"W2057775193","doi":"10.1016/j.jcat.2005.01.021","title":"Adsorption and hydrogenation of pyridine and pyrrole on NiMoS: an ab initio density-functional theory study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Catalysis","topic":"Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Syncrude (Canada); University of Alberta","funders":"Syncrude","keywords":"Chemistry; Catalysis; Pyridine; Adsorption; Density functional theory; Photochemistry; Ab initio; Pyrrole; Hydrogen; Reaction mechanism; Dissociation (chemistry); Activation energy; Reactions on surfaces; Inorganic chemistry; Physical chemistry; Computational chemistry; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004922813,0.0001000277,0.0002691192,0.0002590104,0.0000547013,0.00002448267,0.00003454106,0.00003228707,0.00002241724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004270145,0.00008641437,0.00006205158,0.0001872564,0.00003042487,0.0003357837,0.00001693359,0.0000917673,0.000002112577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003419018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007854739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002385299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003752676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999155,0.00003455083,0.0003840745,0.00009319332,0.00026515,0.00006799574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994432,0.00006053689,0.0001686181,0.0001009301,0.0001714971,0.00005519563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001224554,0.003199134,0.05880158,0.0002147763,0.006898925,0.00003768441,0.0172589,0.5717932,0.2427695,0.00289474,0.00131461,0.09359244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00800843,0.002209853,0.6406405,0.0001703246,0.004325345,0.0003871713,0.009541458,0.1165216,0.2128844,0.002507983,0.001732352,0.001070625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974925,0.0006537864,0.001526782,0.0000683646,0.00004422346,0.00005187566,0.000005211824,0.00001485605,0.0001423948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999384,0.000311945,0.00006751042,0.00002387391,0.000164628,0.000002039132,0.00001490897,0.0000116282,0.00001939986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5818389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3523876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01130796013731713,"score_gpt":0.2197973727035918,"score_spread":0.2084894125662747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}