{"id":"W2057916048","doi":"10.1007/s10551-008-9760-x","title":"Ethical Value-Added: Fair Trade and the Case of Café Femenino","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Business ethics; Fair trade; Argument (complex analysis); Capitalism; Value (mathematics); Quality of Life Research; Economics; Globalization; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Positive economics; Law; Political science; International trade; Market economy; Management; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003807247,0.0002046787,0.0005513099,0.0001680461,0.0005711956,0.000137368,0.0002872148,0.0004776334,0.00001706052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005095347,0.0001327638,0.000216465,0.0007176118,0.001279308,0.0006881144,0.0001132449,0.001917237,0.000001455393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005315625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003368223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002338034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001171038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980594,0.0001811115,0.0007327244,0.0001459368,0.0005906014,0.0002902341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969695,0.0007723036,0.0007703315,0.0001971776,0.001251218,0.00003948633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003749477,0.001602672,0.03765068,0.006330525,0.0009697216,0.015142,0.0679271,0.003337112,0.0002995219,0.8411893,0.01422723,0.007574677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02883261,0.0003408123,0.437894,0.001224072,0.0032785,0.02203793,0.1135683,0.004415254,0.0001558383,0.3400424,0.04597544,0.002234858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.932768,0.0005923277,0.0004758231,0.06368503,0.0005729143,0.0002023806,0.000003933299,0.00002010644,0.001679422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993881,0.0003366427,0.000126737,0.004406626,0.001206554,0.000001064201,0.000001193131,0.00001959916,0.00002052582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5011469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8329546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07211026799176265,"score_gpt":0.3067306620116411,"score_spread":0.2346203940198784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}