{"id":"W2057977349","doi":"10.3391/ai.2009.4.1.7","title":"A screening procedure for potential tunicate invaders of Atlantic Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquatic Invasions","topic":"Marine Ecology and Invasive Species","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tunicate; Biology; Invasive species; Fishery; Aquatic animal; Introduced species; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001261487,0.00009775,0.0001526586,0.00002454214,0.0001827184,0.000006198219,0.0002249729,0.00004366593,0.0009839527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002714792,0.00008644396,0.00005486972,0.0001423218,0.0001215038,0.00008683524,0.00007225908,0.00008282867,0.00001866827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005544352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001188116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1051318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4423253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991491,0.00002550246,0.0002236768,0.0001857308,0.0001704959,0.0002454593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994995,0.0001247406,0.0001007437,0.0001920907,0.000008466437,0.00007443538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002069616,0.000555656,0.345302,0.0001268436,0.0001654798,0.00005807789,0.00117548,0.005351194,0.05421776,0.009935121,0.569208,0.01369753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001919405,0.000805099,0.9326314,0.0001233816,0.0002111646,0.00005896943,0.001119036,0.02096248,0.009496921,0.0137804,0.0181373,0.0007544916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746339,0.00001992552,0.003231689,0.006948438,0.0001210181,0.0006513177,0.000008766083,0.00002405077,0.01436093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940463,0.00001245269,0.003459315,0.001340363,0.00002375667,0.00001611681,0.00001867594,0.000005687019,0.001077358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5873294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02189234980199822,"score_gpt":0.2140730079491705,"score_spread":0.1921806581471723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}