{"id":"W2058130743","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2014-0408","title":"Angle count sampling reliability as ground truth for area-based LiDAR applications in forest inventories","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Provincia autonoma di Bolzano - Alto Adige","keywords":"Ground truth; Mean squared error; Lidar; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Mathematics; Forest inventory; Plot (graphics); Standard error; Calibration; Coefficient of determination; Tree (set theory); Linear regression; Remote sensing; Environmental science; Geography; Forest management; Computer science; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002533784,0.0001042611,0.0001697765,0.0002766623,0.0003377105,0.0001370367,0.0004255277,0.00008880212,0.00004416338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001588557,0.00009421632,0.00007366716,0.0007186691,0.0005239504,0.0001714272,0.00002527536,0.0003776936,0.00003825355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001537272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001696328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05365598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.311014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998284,0.00009557203,0.0003567337,0.0002246436,0.0005131189,0.0005259154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977011,0.0005814655,0.0001038667,0.0003591238,0.0002874239,0.000966992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005565599,0.00007760111,0.9727617,0.00001830367,0.000006541797,0.00001244454,0.0008379971,0.01723821,0.00003819662,0.003084166,0.004138595,0.001730622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001011265,0.0004703488,0.5759681,0.00007570743,0.00001285127,0.00002932667,0.001951322,0.002331721,0.000165985,0.102519,0.3152282,0.0002361378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884216,0.00008756234,0.005327687,0.001603767,0.00008544471,0.0005630714,0.00002476121,0.000005635791,0.003880469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965681,0.000002919277,0.003039699,0.0000554957,0.0001113017,0.00002717117,0.00002016121,0.00001753578,0.0001575465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3967935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9526458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0983836795525462,"score_gpt":0.3452120187209856,"score_spread":0.2468283391684394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}