{"id":"W2058130743","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2014-0408","title":"Angle count sampling reliability as ground truth for area-based LiDAR applications in forest inventories","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Provincia autonoma di Bolzano - Alto Adige","keywords":"Ground truth; Mean squared error; Lidar; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Mathematics; Forest inventory; Plot (graphics); Standard error; Calibration; Coefficient of determination; Tree (set theory); Linear regression; Remote sensing; Environmental science; Geography; Forest management; Computer science; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01130095,0.0005896288,0.0005545896,0.001566236,0.0003972417,0.001141815,0.0008839508,0.0007838623,0.0007231192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03421764,0.0003457005,0.0004555141,0.001934452,0.0005711902,0.0016883,0.001032382,0.0004186374,0.0004812344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004800043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003852246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004079806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00459688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920905,0.004629235,0.0004111598,0.0008958905,0.001772664,0.000200481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722469,0.01929596,0.001895445,0.003187584,0.003231657,0.0001424243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007238338,0.000191108,0.5980738,0.0003639492,0.0002667543,0.0001645179,0.000968327,0.1498055,0.01561835,0.002831081,0.0008805118,0.2301122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005383118,0.0006428372,0.3194908,0.0002082722,0.0002575891,0.0004181335,0.0007352657,0.6517434,0.01849435,0.004243177,0.003596286,0.0001161172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7316015,0.001419104,0.263036,0.00008021624,0.00005629607,0.00008687651,0.0006850037,0.000435382,0.002599617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616069,0.0002183548,0.03709332,0.00002065402,0.00002707132,0.00005597182,0.0006840512,0.00006032238,0.0002334135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01130095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05976588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0983836795525462,"score_gpt":0.3452120187209856,"score_spread":0.2468283391684394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}