{"id":"W2058216803","doi":"10.1890/06-2012.1","title":"ESTIMATION OF POPULATION PARAMETERS FROM AERIAL COUNTS OF NORTH AMERICAN MALLARDS: A CAUTIONARY TALE","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Statistics; Population; Population size; Sampling (signal processing); Density dependence; Series (stratigraphy); Waterfowl; Population model; Aerial survey; Contrast (vision); Best linear unbiased prediction; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Geography; Habitat; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Demography; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04013748,0.001187515,0.001616477,0.001959673,0.001492832,0.003671415,0.003572907,0.002395679,0.001338881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2252161,0.0006732043,0.001395055,0.001922009,0.00416026,0.003987397,0.002274978,0.009123784,0.001352716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008111978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009421427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01288981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01336544,"domain_scores_codex":[0.977994,0.01599315,0.001798948,0.001428384,0.002651256,0.0001342321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8827945,0.09168124,0.003889106,0.01374946,0.007363681,0.0005219872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001251269,0.0002396221,0.1843055,0.003198694,0.00470512,0.00278714,0.006594659,0.1132381,0.01150348,0.04522583,0.1479292,0.4790215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003719577,0.0006642629,0.1379726,0.00477317,0.001158101,0.005174692,0.004209027,0.3022998,0.01845483,0.3674847,0.1561611,0.001275972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1110602,0.01808908,0.7448764,0.1070517,0.00610714,0.0004610855,0.002213628,0.002459454,0.007681249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5524461,0.00948789,0.3880699,0.034335,0.006923436,0.0006014165,0.0008194894,0.0009771662,0.006339636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2122698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01458583028048268,"score_gpt":0.2384871063502151,"score_spread":0.2239012760697324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}