{"id":"W2058260127","doi":"10.1108/13598540510612767","title":"The effect of supplier development initiatives on purchasing performance: a structural model","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supply Chain Management An International Journal","topic":"Quality and Supply Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Supplier relationship management; Structural equation modeling; Business; Supply chain management; Supply chain; Sample (material); Supplier evaluation; Marketing; Empirical research; Process management; Purchasing management; Industrial organization; Operations management; Computer science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00749255,0.001199761,0.0008638523,0.002805611,0.0008137155,0.002768716,0.00252601,0.002144706,0.01219456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02114498,0.0008800702,0.003541536,0.002292424,0.001346087,0.002378859,0.00248491,0.002324768,0.00143039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002918343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004474899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01199568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007404111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944869,0.003378231,0.0002621841,0.000666733,0.0006101959,0.0005958158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628645,0.02766169,0.004172964,0.001208929,0.002440425,0.001651644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001128736,0.002842607,0.8516042,0.0006337825,0.00283788,0.0008343966,0.006964013,0.06497575,0.001341025,0.02251372,0.003140513,0.04118348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004083124,0.00307234,0.3700988,0.0006626977,0.002744712,0.0005471692,0.003984423,0.5864353,0.0006801628,0.02765705,0.0035451,0.0001639536],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634003,0.0007135869,0.02227798,0.00262504,0.00009226466,0.0004536638,0.0009246961,0.0001966776,0.009315923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933426,0.0002844873,0.004149307,0.0001203183,0.00003813916,0.000233612,0.0004138639,0.00002368555,0.001394145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01219456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04079479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01441593342074168,"score_gpt":0.2680036794790251,"score_spread":0.2535877460582834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}