{"id":"W2058330012","doi":"10.1021/jp9919157","title":"Rotamer-Specific Potentials of Mean Force for Residue Pair Interactions","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B","topic":"Protein Structure and Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conformational isomerism; Amino acid residue; Potential of mean force; Residue (chemistry); Monte Carlo method; Chemistry; Umbrella sampling; Statistical physics; Molecular dynamics; Computational chemistry; Molecule; Mathematics; Physics; Statistics; Peptide sequence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001321203,0.0007139341,0.0007544276,0.0008632434,0.00055669,0.000546774,0.002422538,0.001307212,0.00235416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003164198,0.0002940687,0.0008954398,0.0008816574,0.0005541436,0.001034498,0.0009841232,0.001162449,0.0007804969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006350036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008903689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001578998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001941162,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995971,0.0001557349,0.00001202205,0.00002824827,0.0001654616,0.00004136717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991645,0.0004431292,0.00005722449,0.0001257232,0.0001363616,0.00007318991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004987809,0.00004145123,0.0003325604,0.00005975013,0.00005086363,0.0001184719,0.0000579799,0.8099474,0.002602242,0.160609,0.001261141,0.02486925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008493826,0.00001238087,0.00006587791,0.000005154823,0.000004109485,0.00001665883,0.000004279477,0.9699003,0.0002896153,0.02876102,0.0009203722,0.00001175617],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02296375,0.0004104574,0.9711083,0.000164694,0.00008210041,0.00007310579,0.00009296136,0.0002558097,0.004848931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6504846,0.0008516387,0.3389623,0.0002690563,0.0001614081,0.0008910214,0.0004048388,0.0007003077,0.007274771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002422538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007875502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006905196112506111,"score_gpt":0.2500424132783824,"score_spread":0.2431372171658763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}