{"id":"W2058364614","doi":"10.1037/h0087372","title":"Is position \"special\" in visual attention? Evidence that top-down processes guide visual selection.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Visual attention; Eye movement; Contrast (vision); Visual processing; Position (finance); Top-down and bottom-up design; Visual search; Perception; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001513083,0.0003894071,0.0005403246,0.0006476836,0.000537344,0.002422872,0.0007570192,0.00163991,0.002953349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008973904,0.0005734696,0.0005392684,0.0005989715,0.001656729,0.002719674,0.001349973,0.0010935,0.0005984272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006067441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003940193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002631767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002681579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989666,0.0001269923,0.00004475817,0.0003959585,0.0002713391,0.0001942621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958622,0.001702535,0.000925459,0.0007322949,0.0004096502,0.0003677562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002598051,0.0003341965,0.1010426,0.0009955782,0.0003489596,0.001020335,0.004839175,0.001048679,0.558516,0.0347371,0.002759112,0.2917602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002504802,0.0008614893,0.8896599,0.0001157979,0.0002874008,0.001138683,0.000732764,0.006606676,0.03134337,0.0622002,0.006662726,0.0001405265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9342732,0.005388774,0.02913361,0.002446027,0.0004021515,0.00006582816,0.0001410042,0.0002195277,0.02792988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934379,0.001200384,0.002931213,0.0005552975,0.0001952762,0.00002506425,0.00008446584,0.00004852658,0.001521908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002953349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009879947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09933924890650339,"score_gpt":0.3966059873607322,"score_spread":0.2972667384542288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}