{"id":"W2058392411","doi":"10.4236/oje.2012.22008","title":"Landscape spatial structure for predicting suitable habitat: The case of <i>Dalea villosa</i> in Saskatchewan","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal of Ecology","topic":"Botany and Plant Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Villosa; Vegetation (pathology); Occupancy; Ecology; Environmental science; Logistic regression; Spatial variability; Hydrology (agriculture); Agronomy; Biology; Mathematics; Botany; Geology; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005942151,0.0002130504,0.0002487122,0.0007709908,0.0004505891,0.0008823516,0.0005837117,0.0002349205,0.001437302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002383844,0.0001994018,0.0002748794,0.001129409,0.0004570048,0.0003778711,0.0006147031,0.0003253741,0.0002461847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001703322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001569109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4582444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7702598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997057,0.000113386,0.00001574029,0.00006470917,0.00003687527,0.00006356878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991212,0.0002767927,0.0001562941,0.00009594407,0.0001584991,0.0001912607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003016797,0.00002015539,0.9934458,0.000005850141,0.00004147099,0.0001832182,0.0001414459,0.001203488,0.0003455166,0.000100881,0.0001686491,0.004313414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000459847,0.00002434682,0.9881522,0.00001266912,0.00001467939,0.00009957702,0.0009818077,0.01011991,0.0001085272,0.0001608862,0.0003136097,0.000007177713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990808,0.00004035985,0.0003001485,0.00005151136,0.000001254351,0.000005940809,0.0001650696,0.000004075197,0.0003508218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992025,0.00003547813,0.0003809079,0.000006786014,9.077586e-7,0.000004295395,0.0001578857,0.000002717834,0.0002084975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5417556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9111543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03213823003142182,"score_gpt":0.2644704326211069,"score_spread":0.232332202589685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}