{"id":"W2058392411","doi":"10.4236/oje.2012.22008","title":"Landscape spatial structure for predicting suitable habitat: The case of <i>Dalea villosa</i> in Saskatchewan","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal of Ecology","topic":"Botany and Plant Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Villosa; Vegetation (pathology); Occupancy; Ecology; Environmental science; Logistic regression; Spatial variability; Hydrology (agriculture); Agronomy; Biology; Mathematics; Botany; Geology; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002065866,0.0002511746,0.000738741,0.00004255705,0.0005386342,0.00006357066,0.0007149577,0.0003458049,0.001565695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007375279,0.00009853685,0.0001794658,0.0002532778,0.0001885657,0.0003589181,0.0003011489,0.0004787086,0.00001594552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004417582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006013932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004981707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5228247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997657,0.0004334155,0.0008133438,0.0002406839,0.0001416696,0.0007138746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962044,0.00246082,0.0008132192,0.0001184264,0.0002434857,0.0001596857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007294156,0.0003596932,0.9295899,0.00003236406,0.0003131361,0.00006093533,0.00282049,0.00009335842,0.04072865,0.0001557522,0.01670749,0.008408815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001846165,0.001174139,0.8307283,0.00008567752,0.0002925948,0.004886671,0.004274055,0.00001654118,0.0003104142,0.001348198,0.154564,0.000473262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943547,0.0008578514,0.00001890737,0.002157087,0.001043474,0.0005390857,0.0003698865,0.000007244677,0.0006517286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968534,0.00006747457,0.001189671,0.0002990403,0.000783182,0.0000189124,0.00006243394,0.000003612509,0.0007223262],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5223265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03213823003142182,"score_gpt":0.2644704326211069,"score_spread":0.232332202589685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}