{"id":"W2058552952","doi":"10.1093/ps/83.2.207","title":"Assessing bone mineral density in vivo: digitized fluoroscopy and ultrasound","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poultry Science","topic":"Animal Nutrition and Physiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government","keywords":"Bone mineral; Ultrasound; Osteoporosis; Fluoroscopy; Quantitative computed tomography; Medicine; Bone density; Tibia; Nuclear medicine; Densitometry; Radiography; Animal science; Anatomy; Internal medicine; Surgery; Radiology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002367601,0.00008502887,0.0001227793,0.00001773463,0.0002480645,0.0001812865,0.0001454004,0.00005078915,0.00005330566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001314865,0.00003595879,0.00002254422,0.0005105638,0.0004204143,0.0005474825,0.00004749434,0.00009929081,0.000009415658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003147856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001989622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002683569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000134429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991051,0.00002387336,0.0001251555,0.0003071324,0.0001595258,0.0002792225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996653,0.0001106317,0.00003782607,0.00003287593,0.00004340285,0.0001099817],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001090304,0.00004260853,0.05975852,0.000001728246,2.867972e-7,0.00000463893,0.00003486982,0.000001839012,0.9384569,0.0005989128,0.00001847845,0.001070296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002485453,0.00008210533,0.9766212,0.00002015391,0.000001138121,0.00004797433,0.0004178898,0.000008589977,0.01692962,0.005304907,0.0001933614,0.0001245053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998082,0.00004264877,0.000006706977,0.0006790693,0.0000616353,0.00006795266,0.00000579356,0.00003606742,0.001018067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986946,0.00002527631,0.0006598861,0.0005181,0.00006237459,0.000002516085,0.000003736417,3.365614e-7,0.00003314669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9215273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1907936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01991524757535746,"score_gpt":0.2633651964934374,"score_spread":0.2434499489180799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}