{"id":"W2058642475","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.06.001","title":"Evaluation of two simple extreme transshipment strategies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Production Economics","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transshipment (information security); Computer science; Operations research; Economic shortage; Stock (firearms); Stocking; Extreme point; Set (abstract data type); Service (business); Mathematical optimization; Business; Mathematics; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002017411,0.000882465,0.0006602398,0.0008084414,0.000494977,0.001074977,0.001339304,0.001299188,0.005350344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00900265,0.0002075983,0.000391447,0.0006073103,0.0005623802,0.001422971,0.0009525289,0.000593947,0.0003390231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007529171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005783172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001463446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001344611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999127,0.0004080441,0.00004603025,0.00009828548,0.000159326,0.0001613757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922795,0.005472453,0.0004172402,0.0005325096,0.000763335,0.0005349794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0137189,0.002938719,0.009092726,0.0005616247,0.0002789157,0.000519414,0.0004695706,0.733839,0.01568061,0.0123939,0.00136071,0.2091459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007754604,0.01269714,0.006346113,0.00004313879,0.0002496259,0.000209559,0.0007351874,0.9567129,0.01471713,0.006010694,0.001431824,0.00007111658],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716392,0.0001449036,0.02179069,0.0001054682,0.00003975508,0.0001266386,0.00005329654,0.0001247197,0.005975314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928769,0.00003299503,0.006054098,0.00002130528,0.000004388245,0.00004208477,0.00003714605,0.00001253625,0.0009185083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005350344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01789868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0855679889349906,"score_gpt":0.2935228813546792,"score_spread":0.2079548924196886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}