{"id":"W2058709917","doi":"10.1115/ipc2006-10474","title":"A Quantitative Approach to Tensile Strain Capacity of Pipelines","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Volume 3: Materials and Joining; Pipeline Automation and Measurement; Risk and Reliability, Parts A and B","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"TransCanada (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ultimate tensile strength; Limit state design; Structural engineering; Welding; Tensile testing; Materials science; Toughness; Stress–strain curve; Pipeline transport; Strain (injury); Computer science; Composite material; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Finite element method","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002578875,0.001266823,0.0005504928,0.006287855,0.0004713637,0.002082355,0.002149148,0.0009204372,0.005157098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007863013,0.0006310903,0.0009298211,0.002627161,0.00195269,0.003386051,0.001685021,0.00155422,0.001033444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00128261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009626238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002077424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001372552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966642,0.0006560917,0.0002293358,0.0005517217,0.001764615,0.0001340723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966619,0.001576612,0.0003439964,0.0005274523,0.0008261221,0.00006398118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007039012,0.000118842,0.00337541,0.001142559,0.0000809481,0.0002066537,0.0006430608,0.370551,0.07504973,0.4082456,0.002384241,0.1381316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009490129,0.0002075172,0.005909999,0.000230911,0.00004261972,0.0003099005,0.000244869,0.7648627,0.04214609,0.1567108,0.0291606,0.0001645502],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01018169,0.0007842071,0.9750662,0.000121525,0.00004436641,0.0000825517,0.0007941597,0.0005492245,0.01237606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5765178,0.00300081,0.404911,0.0001551904,0.0002712625,0.0007028509,0.001844545,0.0005818215,0.01201463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006287855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01725215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02698250305995491,"score_gpt":0.2280260282138918,"score_spread":0.2010435251539369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}