{"id":"W2058709917","doi":"10.1115/ipc2006-10474","title":"A Quantitative Approach to Tensile Strain Capacity of Pipelines","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Volume 3: Materials and Joining; Pipeline Automation and Measurement; Risk and Reliability, Parts A and B","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"TransCanada (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ultimate tensile strength; Limit state design; Structural engineering; Welding; Tensile testing; Materials science; Toughness; Stress–strain curve; Pipeline transport; Strain (injury); Computer science; Composite material; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Finite element method","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001380324,0.0002782327,0.0005880254,0.0001398966,0.0002027881,0.0001386904,0.00004875367,0.0001649908,0.00002518137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000273542,0.0002097348,0.00005425107,0.0001548671,0.0002586765,0.0001671118,0.00004912075,0.0001288595,0.000001527595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001935919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001545353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001343227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000140482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982206,0.0001502296,0.0007069335,0.0004020715,0.0002806445,0.0002395822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991915,0.00005614484,0.0001394752,0.0001764886,0.0002973943,0.0001389724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006481815,0.001003533,0.07503188,0.009526786,0.0005311635,0.000004837125,0.01250784,0.01780249,0.8138858,0.007655519,0.01391571,0.04748626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003673326,0.0009748211,0.4518258,0.0007680323,0.001137476,0.00008997496,0.003744844,0.4585496,0.04921299,0.01490931,0.01307479,0.002039027],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927932,0.00096497,0.004769043,0.0002565236,0.0001819195,0.0003792316,0.0002504726,0.0001181096,0.0002865004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929998,0.000758011,0.005966628,0.00003707325,0.00009657312,0.00002164404,0.00003377683,0.0000162583,0.00007024168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7646728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8552735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02698250305995491,"score_gpt":0.2280260282138918,"score_spread":0.2010435251539369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}