{"id":"W2058845665","doi":"10.3141/2342-15","title":"Internal Curing of Concrete Bridge Decks in Utah","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board","topic":"Concrete Properties and Behavior","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council Canada; Utah Department of Transportation; Indiana Department of Transportation; Ohio Department of Transportation","keywords":"Cracking; Curing (chemistry); Materials science; Deck; Bridge deck; Composite material; Moisture; Compressive strength; Geotechnical engineering; Types of concrete; Thermal diffusivity; Silica fume; Water content; Structural engineering; Environmental science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00205002,0.0001997328,0.0004406449,0.0008986089,0.0001246873,0.00008727304,0.0008880441,0.0001451327,0.0007937237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007630615,0.0001516849,0.0002914442,0.001199814,0.0003676948,0.0006642662,0.000007686159,0.001958702,0.00003275781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000195363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001979279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01293255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952128,0.0003913465,0.00145957,0.0002166884,0.001998587,0.0007210164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970495,0.0003813861,0.0001936922,0.00032213,0.001797197,0.0002561471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008060365,0.00007730351,0.7952694,0.0008830274,0.0001933359,0.0001578991,0.005950102,0.003706246,0.1475294,0.0004491201,0.007350643,0.03762747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001237709,0.0002513643,0.9794604,0.0006103086,0.00002138872,8.389435e-7,0.001012695,0.001182685,0.01315374,0.000374499,0.002526279,0.0001681058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997208,0.0004256035,0.0003516282,0.0005493115,0.0004227255,0.0007421793,0.00002759048,0.00002472814,0.0002482391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979893,0.0009565048,0.0005885212,0.00001100881,0.00009118145,0.00006942318,0.000005073011,0.00005133075,0.0002376735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1841909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9848568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.080291881567086,"score_gpt":0.3447314851479508,"score_spread":0.2644396035808648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}