{"id":"W2058896206","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.035","title":"Methods of enforcing earthquake base motions in seismic analysis of structures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Structures","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Atomic Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Base (topology); Structural engineering; Computer science; Modal analysis; Seismic analysis; Fragility; Displacement (psychology); Earthquake engineering; Modal; Equations of motion; Engineering; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Finite element method; Physics; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002015241,0.0001966892,0.0005079342,0.001292815,0.00001956475,0.00001126912,0.0002057221,0.0001230494,0.0001625603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000794861,0.0001896611,0.0002187523,0.001543101,0.00003419382,0.0001133931,0.0000237136,0.0003531514,4.197545e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001666938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001310659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001297466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003154159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989882,0.00001467472,0.0004509523,0.0001560223,0.00015115,0.0002389843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994011,0.00008291264,0.00006295884,0.0003616937,0.00003539006,0.00005595207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000118627,0.000003124855,0.001329901,0.00007398731,0.0004169996,0.000001076963,0.0003741693,0.8967569,0.0950838,0.0005912748,0.000009193218,0.005358383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115194,0.00000600836,0.1478662,0.00001123565,0.000265053,0.00000185117,0.00005181266,0.7786896,0.072511,0.0002040571,0.0001290836,0.0001488988],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8962029,0.0001555419,0.1030964,0.000005636871,0.000265864,0.00004685571,0.00003060333,0.00008551367,0.0001107255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533843,0.00002118682,0.04647766,0.000009897592,0.00004725699,0.000004412335,0.00002416439,0.00002413906,0.00000701211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1465364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7734155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006118349430892286,"score_gpt":0.2511587565400959,"score_spread":0.2450404071092036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}