{"id":"W2058941223","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2010.07.003","title":"Accountants’ cognitive styles and ethical reasoning: A comparison across 15years","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting Education","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Academic Accounting Association","keywords":"Defining Issues Test; Sample (material); Psychology; Cognitive style; Cognition; Test (biology); Style (visual arts); Curriculum; Point (geometry); Accounting; Orientation (vector space); Social psychology; Pedagogy; Moral reasoning; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002872962,0.0002887611,0.0005136913,0.002146015,0.001535813,0.002791823,0.0004791518,0.0008180377,0.003291948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01162412,0.0002673864,0.0007428359,0.001524169,0.0009510335,0.001457284,0.001375319,0.0007741753,0.0004317949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001394636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001367936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01972935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02439311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986433,0.0003334247,0.0001471935,0.000127328,0.0003347785,0.0004139908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896318,0.002600921,0.00273712,0.0004479884,0.002301488,0.002280677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005343323,0.000318231,0.9808878,0.00001033842,0.00007605677,0.0002193492,0.01041746,0.00007495621,0.0002444948,0.0001650872,0.0001849196,0.006867001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001470262,0.0003344026,0.9867924,0.000009396154,0.00002687648,0.0001975823,0.01144276,0.0001710138,0.0001439373,0.0001732976,0.000675944,0.00001762372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995043,0.0000643982,0.00001695818,0.00003865246,0.000004749537,0.000004524607,0.00002767398,9.598405e-7,0.0003376297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992734,0.00006082665,0.00003016164,0.00002968848,0.000004367885,0.00000521517,0.00007792336,0.000001180628,0.0005172867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01972935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03922904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1425872628913833,"score_gpt":0.5009731908630005,"score_spread":0.3583859279716172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}