{"id":"W205902208","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.17.003","title":"The Inclusion of Stakeholders in Evaluation: Benefits and Drawbacks","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Inclusion (mineral); Foundation (evidence); Process (computing); Empirical research; Evaluation methods; Business; Process management; Management science; Knowledge management; Psychology; Computer science; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Social psychology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2961636,0.001279515,0.001598997,0.003085999,0.004650601,0.01159752,0.002769578,0.005831858,0.003274257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3657112,0.0009990371,0.001746484,0.003334356,0.00900353,0.01604059,0.01295674,0.005371577,0.001129883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005136479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01038918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002859823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003979861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4448505,0.4613886,0.0163813,0.004800933,0.06961619,0.002962486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3243755,0.5727918,0.01607652,0.02438193,0.05863218,0.003742232],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002946401,0.00112534,0.05652166,0.009004898,0.0006079179,0.0006884284,0.01810005,0.004945605,0.003916105,0.121401,0.01037528,0.7703673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001449855,0.005956932,0.09320729,0.05211712,0.003486458,0.008284329,0.07135799,0.06755213,0.03423587,0.4524514,0.2088512,0.001049396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.319269,0.04211194,0.2662507,0.1937612,0.00154199,0.003153019,0.0002238472,0.000628838,0.1730595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9260803,0.002993433,0.06145656,0.005196373,0.0004664328,0.001003454,0.00004264731,0.0000837696,0.002677035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7038364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8679556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5130399514960976,"score_gpt":0.5057613927462337,"score_spread":0.007278558749863939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}