{"id":"W2059027884","doi":"10.1002/hyp.7054","title":"Evaluation of three evaporation estimation methods in a Canadian prairie landscape","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrological Processes","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences","keywords":"Evaporation; Eddy covariance; Environmental science; Potential evaporation; Transpiration; Relative humidity; Penman–Monteith equation; Atmospheric sciences; Humidity; Hydrology (agriculture); Evapotranspiration; Meteorology; Ecosystem; Chemistry; Geography; Geology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002222057,0.0008125769,0.0006032357,0.0014494,0.0008765699,0.001303511,0.001459194,0.0004849263,0.0004569079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003940154,0.0004150067,0.0005935167,0.001398293,0.00035647,0.0007352417,0.0006898731,0.0004486668,0.00007211103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005391224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002424521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5653629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6692614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999199,0.0001716426,0.00004227558,0.0001863418,0.0003136205,0.00008710547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985431,0.0006286894,0.0001334528,0.00008701003,0.0005300327,0.00007768714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001405946,0.0004643598,0.1574713,0.0002771854,0.0007606645,0.0001825286,0.000585314,0.5200463,0.01363589,0.001019308,0.0008585449,0.3032926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112713,0.000175428,0.08267776,0.0000137969,0.0001176129,0.00004298938,0.0001476815,0.9117959,0.004111983,0.0001647692,0.0005743507,0.00006506468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.979509,0.0002375224,0.01781599,0.0000999066,0.000007491051,0.0001050483,0.0003061474,0.0004614692,0.00145748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601656,0.0001307121,0.03871911,0.00001550155,0.000003338397,0.00005026857,0.0003717931,0.00003533053,0.0005083457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4346371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8743936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05067894790761019,"score_gpt":0.3077895045507413,"score_spread":0.2571105566431311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}