{"id":"W2059027884","doi":"10.1002/hyp.7054","title":"Evaluation of three evaporation estimation methods in a Canadian prairie landscape","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrological Processes","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences","keywords":"Evaporation; Eddy covariance; Environmental science; Potential evaporation; Transpiration; Relative humidity; Penman–Monteith equation; Atmospheric sciences; Humidity; Hydrology (agriculture); Evapotranspiration; Meteorology; Ecosystem; Chemistry; Geography; Geology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001223131,0.00006633186,0.00009498608,0.0000609125,0.00005996303,0.000005583111,0.00008424096,0.00008569353,0.0004381644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005376947,0.00005265037,0.00001343263,0.0003852701,0.00008307804,0.0001781288,0.00001963382,0.00006858479,0.00002790798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001203778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001402322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01489014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2338842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990698,0.0001155718,0.0001826244,0.0001569922,0.000324869,0.0001502209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996944,0.00005416147,0.0000706152,0.00008142445,0.00003850797,0.00006086048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008506307,0.00005453436,0.3407511,0.000008750494,0.000003636125,0.00000421121,0.0001799413,0.6493082,0.0003128284,0.00008198323,0.000035171,0.00925115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001596969,0.00004347534,0.1512543,0.000004431631,0.0000158792,0.00001320174,0.000002597311,0.8349344,0.0001763279,0.01321617,0.0001158287,0.00006366963],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819905,0.00008771515,0.004913002,0.0002022754,0.00001697264,0.0002106697,0.000003707658,0.00001509437,0.01256007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947855,0.00001066118,0.005075628,0.00003466841,0.000004668612,0.00003468812,0.00003638218,0.000003018534,0.00001480177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2189941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05067894790761019,"score_gpt":0.3077895045507413,"score_spread":0.2571105566431311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}