{"id":"W2059032550","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2013.02.008","title":"A tight characterization of strategic games with a unique equilibrium","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Wireless Networks and Protocols","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Action (physics); Strategy; Characterization (materials science); Mathematical economics; A priori and a posteriori; Correlated equilibrium; Best response; Game theory; Solution concept; Mathematical optimization; Repeated game; Equilibrium selection; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004963988,0.000152196,0.0002042647,0.0001130729,0.00009795478,0.0004485177,0.001663992,0.00004540135,0.00008021378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000054683,0.0001019959,0.00003268295,0.001105296,0.001575519,0.001061183,0.0004603465,0.0001243192,0.00003179601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001795812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001693278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005433335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.056967e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982906,0.00009389947,0.0002470195,0.000471617,0.0004807656,0.0004161295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986643,0.00008540072,0.0001149582,0.0006549595,0.0002908748,0.0001895072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006078872,0.0000402745,0.00007297233,0.00001295303,0.000002570863,0.00000271928,0.0001557861,0.00008465075,0.02179779,0.9679247,0.000005529556,0.009893989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002292233,0.000600451,0.003858719,0.0001046146,0.000002323507,0.0000267019,0.000002769212,0.8380206,0.02911683,0.127775,0.0000330531,0.0002297319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2614396,0.000002307957,0.7350191,0.0005234063,0.00007427703,0.001099882,5.739435e-7,0.00009015905,0.001750669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9418007,9.83763e-7,0.05769882,0.0002228331,0.00006463093,0.0001930182,9.668803e-7,0.000006429972,0.0000116693],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8401497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5805064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01341905499761858,"score_gpt":0.2315944658297264,"score_spread":0.2181754108321078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}