{"id":"W2059032550","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2013.02.008","title":"A tight characterization of strategic games with a unique equilibrium","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Wireless Networks and Protocols","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Action (physics); Strategy; Characterization (materials science); Mathematical economics; A priori and a posteriori; Correlated equilibrium; Best response; Game theory; Solution concept; Mathematical optimization; Repeated game; Equilibrium selection; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003760848,0.002431561,0.003588862,0.004808917,0.003554441,0.008297772,0.004701526,0.003508095,0.01918726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02180656,0.002045873,0.002846416,0.005007425,0.005604562,0.01410298,0.006810183,0.009052012,0.002399688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003228213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002558948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002118984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001461477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949004,0.001432699,0.0003541239,0.001327385,0.0009457245,0.001039627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816833,0.01110771,0.001860689,0.001128455,0.002042445,0.002177461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006639787,0.00005316634,0.0001982906,0.00006884851,0.00002834457,0.00006730625,0.0002776167,0.003447015,0.0009635807,0.9901308,0.001836092,0.002862662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003829445,0.00005886181,0.0002249254,0.00003502964,0.00002928209,0.00009995607,0.0001272735,0.02874656,0.0003356951,0.968597,0.001676343,0.00003065747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1760107,0.0008263377,0.716262,0.004470787,0.0002665429,0.0003204682,0.001228532,0.0006554394,0.0999593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.910508,0.001089714,0.05974224,0.001160242,0.0006491106,0.0006857904,0.001175221,0.0003382137,0.02465151],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01918726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06418782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01341905499761858,"score_gpt":0.2315944658297264,"score_spread":0.2181754108321078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}