{"id":"W2059055740","doi":"10.1177/1541931213571273","title":"The Use of Paired Comparisons for Evaluating Complex Route Matching Performance in a Spatial Awareness Task","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Closeness; Task (project management); Matching (statistics); Identification (biology); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Paired comparison; Statistics; Data set; Spatial contextual awareness; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Pattern recognition (psychology); Mathematics; Geography; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02585972,0.001578799,0.001139093,0.002660328,0.0009727502,0.001274396,0.001510631,0.001082996,0.003201827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08067037,0.0005102542,0.0008782391,0.001882549,0.001867987,0.002190063,0.00138984,0.002025197,0.0005495229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004256396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006140331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003194879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004514182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9650997,0.02202699,0.002043865,0.003431532,0.006909385,0.000488526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.896633,0.08384645,0.005381031,0.006522465,0.006760883,0.0008561256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03320939,0.007327563,0.09638627,0.002631542,0.002235759,0.001071158,0.008646256,0.01170505,0.2288717,0.01813092,0.004900732,0.5848836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002174728,0.1437064,0.4698192,0.000237646,0.001009737,0.002869992,0.003702513,0.1044827,0.2263239,0.03174316,0.01279827,0.001131708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3846834,0.0002767853,0.6019133,0.000116854,0.0009374109,0.003415381,0.0007521351,0.0009306869,0.006974094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6692,0.0001133322,0.31965,0.00007665334,0.0002100764,0.008937245,0.0003489693,0.0002437774,0.001219991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02585972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.136761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06980281579883235,"score_gpt":0.2688669701066903,"score_spread":0.199064154307858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}