{"id":"W2059237287","doi":"10.1080/00288233.2003.9513539","title":"A cost‐benefit analysis of the value of investment in a wapiti hybridisation research programme and the returns to New Zealand venison producers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internal rate of return; Purebred; Investment (military); Hybrid; Biology; Herd; Net present value; Rate of return; Value (mathematics); Agricultural science; Agricultural economics; Economics; Ecology; Breed; Agronomy; Statistics; Production (economics); Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005658797,0.00008907283,0.0002764269,0.0002158132,0.0001442948,0.00004194712,0.0003427289,0.0000685667,0.00008650534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001323755,0.00003978146,0.0001013493,0.002528623,0.0003410874,0.000155855,0.0001248796,0.0005334344,0.000003616886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000264503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001896303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005088398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005072271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968235,0.00099482,0.0004687518,0.0001877798,0.001147844,0.0003772563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986538,0.0005540045,0.0002168475,0.0001903292,0.0001865604,0.0001984291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005031876,0.0001519334,0.9504627,0.000007978945,0.0001646934,0.000002768235,0.009230359,0.002903442,0.00355344,0.0008168435,0.02828908,0.003913546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001219604,0.0003765179,0.9902199,0.00004899073,0.00006410346,0.00001596514,0.00123613,0.00004283632,0.00146603,0.0025474,0.002713213,0.0000493319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792773,0.0001040029,0.00000135991,0.01954279,0.00003759665,0.0007208229,0.000001612771,0.000001239152,0.0003132923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960071,0.000139173,0.0001852464,0.00008945357,0.00004635249,0.00001445745,0.000002023973,0.000003629022,0.003512493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03975715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.769217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0618944889964886,"score_gpt":0.3265045609192601,"score_spread":0.2646100719227715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}