{"id":"W2059293814","doi":"10.3109/09638288.2011.624249","title":"Validation of the Danish version of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment using classical test theory and the Rasch model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability and Rehabilitation","topic":"Dysphagia Assessment and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Herlev Hospital; Hospital Research Foundation; McGill University","keywords":"Rasch model; Construct validity; Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Construct (python library); Internal consistency; Danish; Classical test theory; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Item response theory; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01485187,0.0005548323,0.0007040271,0.001794613,0.001383274,0.001752605,0.001194845,0.0004577034,0.001562397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0477136,0.0002875633,0.001035933,0.001450578,0.0008050117,0.0006626276,0.001463122,0.0007212015,0.0004141487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004809794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01055959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2115745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2942202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9895647,0.003104264,0.001256759,0.0008549666,0.004793179,0.0004260943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763659,0.007572046,0.001849735,0.0013918,0.01219877,0.0006217432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001073174,0.0002898303,0.8032548,0.0007611781,0.0004502485,0.0001997196,0.005873988,0.004102936,0.002072388,0.002994341,0.003512503,0.1754149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102646,0.0004564403,0.9761016,0.0004762665,0.000151892,0.0002222356,0.00252871,0.007724651,0.001396274,0.000926048,0.009841066,0.0000722055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9703301,0.001640746,0.01277413,0.000494434,0.0002202074,0.001116288,0.003338622,0.00007920674,0.01000618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709909,0.0006839599,0.02361985,0.0001361358,0.00002627804,0.0007851464,0.00216773,0.00002238616,0.001567572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2115745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4206859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03251944522665239,"score_gpt":0.3687479240485469,"score_spread":0.3362284788218945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}