{"id":"W2059293814","doi":"10.3109/09638288.2011.624249","title":"Validation of the Danish version of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment using classical test theory and the Rasch model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability and Rehabilitation","topic":"Dysphagia Assessment and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Herlev Hospital; Hospital Research Foundation; McGill University","keywords":"Rasch model; Construct validity; Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Construct (python library); Internal consistency; Danish; Classical test theory; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Item response theory; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003223874,0.0001031228,0.000190841,0.00001731842,0.0006456929,0.000003580042,0.000147161,0.00009025018,0.0000233421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001522745,0.00004880126,0.00008583525,0.0001540212,0.001693369,0.0001651959,0.0002941582,0.000241255,4.094602e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001184759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006945101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001258517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003388192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971415,0.001817062,0.0004394561,0.0002102562,0.0002593192,0.0001323442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946718,0.004435251,0.0003258171,0.0003869309,0.0001530309,0.00002721189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003316427,0.0007191497,0.7168408,0.0006440354,0.00005350771,1.67101e-8,0.01886823,0.0002297614,0.001393187,0.2592719,0.0001302976,0.001517472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001244615,0.00009365194,0.8987781,0.0001852342,0.0001609573,9.483222e-8,0.01093678,0.006776397,0.0002695503,0.08143145,0.00005546827,0.00006763518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929388,0.00001165801,0.0006866413,0.002432875,0.0002003053,0.001610764,0.00004666121,0.00001011322,0.002062222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982554,0.00001189878,0.001418252,0.0001114415,0.00001227258,0.00005575085,0.000003062581,0.000007012921,0.0001248599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1819374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6239288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03251944522665239,"score_gpt":0.3687479240485469,"score_spread":0.3362284788218945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}