{"id":"W2059353387","doi":"10.1016/s0165-1889(98)00089-x","title":"Uncertainty aversion and rationality in games of perfect information","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Subgame; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Rationality; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Contrast (vision); Perfection; Game theory; Perfect information; Complete information; Extensive-form game; Solution concept; Microeconomics; Repeated game; Computer science; Equilibrium selection","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00854427,0.0008332252,0.001903543,0.0009549109,0.0009047476,0.005109604,0.001460971,0.00268773,0.004132449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03821415,0.0009390147,0.001021493,0.0009635754,0.005198654,0.006625459,0.001764947,0.003359844,0.0002277867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002166466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002179173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003818174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002541366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99573,0.002516833,0.0002240614,0.0004559573,0.0005506224,0.0005224187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9554232,0.03936493,0.002518003,0.0009785509,0.0009864721,0.000728842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001089696,0.00005077837,0.0008702052,0.00006729981,0.00006964995,0.00008293884,0.0003368861,0.02959868,0.0001327421,0.9638029,0.0009396926,0.00393924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004711694,0.00001649016,0.0003082156,0.00001096573,0.00001476148,0.00001703868,0.00008826055,0.03071395,0.0000318987,0.9684213,0.0003153331,0.00001452803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4431356,0.002587531,0.4458928,0.01873176,0.0003442519,0.0002010176,0.0004170119,0.0001330542,0.08855701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868219,0.0006283651,0.008848927,0.0002971682,0.0001742353,0.00007946626,0.00004475612,0.00001329885,0.003091878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00854427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04518694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004552500064606847,"score_gpt":0.1778999682970681,"score_spread":0.1733474682324612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}