{"id":"W2059353387","doi":"10.1016/s0165-1889(98)00089-x","title":"Uncertainty aversion and rationality in games of perfect information","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Subgame; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Rationality; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Contrast (vision); Perfection; Game theory; Perfect information; Complete information; Extensive-form game; Solution concept; Microeconomics; Repeated game; Computer science; Equilibrium selection","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007538009,0.00008245567,0.0004042038,0.0001537068,0.00002877975,0.00004068541,0.00007478145,0.0000591253,0.0002103197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002088385,0.00008724701,0.00007111699,0.00002141772,0.00005579521,0.0006050522,0.00001152935,0.00009955079,0.000008332584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001314777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003351866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002100638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008371386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989176,0.00001301132,0.0008638515,0.00009069119,0.00001240347,0.0001023997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992108,0.00007210089,0.0005659406,0.00007983834,0.00002019548,0.00005106792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004487926,0.00004334423,0.08615932,0.00004092851,0.0001020063,0.000001067062,0.0005980761,0.02707493,0.000004364794,0.8553692,0.00007411531,0.03008392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00572396,0.000286378,0.06356284,0.0000396234,0.00001872701,0.00003975192,0.0003557083,0.735808,0.000003720307,0.1863727,0.007545188,0.0002434044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926147,0.0008559517,0.001062745,0.0005638585,0.0001432144,0.00008741687,0.000153241,0.000001571927,0.004517312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974649,0.00217998,0.00007389054,0.0001101648,0.00004972458,0.000001363468,0.000005203928,0.000004093155,0.0001106961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.708733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.355783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004552500064606847,"score_gpt":0.1778999682970681,"score_spread":0.1733474682324612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}