{"id":"W2059354914","doi":"10.1108/09696470710726970","title":"The individual|collective dialectic in the learning organization","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Learning Organization","topic":"Organizational Learning and Leadership","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Dialectic; Originality; Learning organization; Value (mathematics); Collective action; Sociology; Organizational learning; Action (physics); Collaborative learning; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Creativity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003908772,0.0002346366,0.0001521111,0.0002605419,0.003417939,0.001140567,0.0007004902,0.0001317112,0.0002242863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01146344,0.0001415723,0.00003231777,0.0074204,0.0001372737,0.0005615591,0.0001476705,0.001107092,0.0006518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001406346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000948021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001197205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001419579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978448,0.0003306699,0.000388639,0.0003099431,0.0006466561,0.0004792516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974658,0.001220045,0.0004197095,0.0002527439,0.0006284272,0.0000131997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003683784,0.00008656819,0.9267662,0.00004056947,0.0000529125,0.000008511265,0.01562298,0.02993339,0.0007061149,0.02181979,0.001957101,0.002969055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007096735,0.00004232004,0.9252324,0.00005211878,0.0001394014,0.00002470416,0.02228285,0.002001105,0.0004018066,0.001433059,0.04723234,0.0004481851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499618,0.0002345397,0.01520539,0.02125439,0.0008036224,0.0009771202,3.84266e-7,0.0007945905,0.01076809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940717,0.00001661484,0.00001545212,0.001726149,0.001581016,0.000005104179,0.0001270035,0.0001067398,0.002350196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04527524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02358356314105486,"score_gpt":0.2266502834655394,"score_spread":0.2030667203244845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}