{"id":"W2059533306","doi":"10.1080/07352689.2013.791501","title":"Predicting Plant Diversity Response to Disturbance: Applicability of the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis and Mass Ratio Hypothesis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Ecosystem; Biodiversity; Productivity; Ecology; Biology; Biomass (ecology); Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis; Species diversity; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001768315,0.0001148315,0.0002692682,0.00002542005,0.0004814916,0.00002421791,0.0004427845,0.0000407713,0.00009119265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006238349,0.00006953223,0.00004387313,0.0002962074,0.001922103,0.0001884928,0.0005836826,0.0001138405,0.00004704762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006412347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009353133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006160959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002388671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984528,0.0003477764,0.000340857,0.0003690942,0.0002367941,0.0002526695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966415,0.003007585,0.00007960392,0.0001814664,0.0000092973,0.0000806184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002705818,0.00003656997,0.995804,0.00004559068,0.00000182549,8.260621e-7,0.0006696812,0.00002835947,0.0007009594,0.0003225799,0.0002819109,0.002080622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005587565,0.00004885062,0.9922295,0.0001095518,0.000009452219,0.000002179587,0.000205725,0.00180518,0.0001380692,0.004977044,0.0003250609,0.00009354363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957293,0.0004504292,0.0001948612,0.002165162,0.000111656,0.0005682441,0.00004959323,0.000007941127,0.0007227907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978294,0.0003441546,0.001268828,0.000395232,0.000008156738,0.00009705906,2.823045e-7,0.000001991127,0.00005489842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004654464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7468337,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03418257766204171,"score_gpt":0.2589965894925262,"score_spread":0.2248140118304845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}