{"id":"W2059561827","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0242-x","title":"Maximum likelihood approach to vote aggregation with variable probabilities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Ranking (information retrieval); Independence (probability theory); Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Approval voting; Social choice theory; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Majority rule; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Voting; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01459863,0.001310553,0.005304513,0.003623782,0.001989484,0.005553281,0.005522844,0.003959424,0.009312502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06066149,0.002505644,0.00282922,0.004963589,0.003940057,0.00790988,0.00374886,0.004031379,0.001317357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002889011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002148453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007366924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007738412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857447,0.01078734,0.0004044469,0.001258546,0.001210458,0.0005945701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9443156,0.05037558,0.001283994,0.002324853,0.001337477,0.0003625358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001550094,0.0001291504,0.001313134,0.0001695693,0.0002429837,0.0001356732,0.0004218446,0.3666737,0.0002604197,0.589062,0.002870262,0.03856631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002914889,0.00001227772,0.0001988276,0.00001741568,0.00001928869,0.00002278451,0.00002410109,0.6074197,0.00009850107,0.3915355,0.000603889,0.00001853195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007419747,0.0002635885,0.9893286,0.0006864327,0.00003426708,0.00005710676,0.0001695702,0.0001325186,0.001908186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5094958,0.0009097415,0.470442,0.0004131584,0.0007143006,0.001053174,0.001231641,0.0002807212,0.01545942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01459863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07720584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01739028215539142,"score_gpt":0.2021745656071914,"score_spread":0.1847842834518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}