{"id":"W2059578613","doi":"10.1897/ieam_2009-016.1","title":"A risk-ranking methodology for prioritizing historic, potentially contaminated mine sites in British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Agriculture; Government of British Columbia; SNC-Lavalin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Christian ministry; Human health; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Computer science; Business; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007652577,0.0003265388,0.0004775341,0.00007673477,0.0004039675,0.0002568249,0.0002780831,0.0001658896,0.0006879548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001389584,0.0004548886,0.0001341559,0.0002148972,0.0001972674,0.0004188607,0.0002577914,0.0003088052,0.00002135259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001705353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007675022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007580096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01782423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972566,0.0002493497,0.0005786552,0.0008006913,0.000426522,0.00068817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992478,0.00008648654,0.0002488763,0.0002330411,0.000003062002,0.0001807565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005582697,0.001026035,0.6880258,0.0000280935,0.0001302684,0.0001680134,0.000315549,0.00009865218,0.0229881,0.00006055113,0.002101283,0.2850018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002356531,0.0005272658,0.9847873,0.00005670954,0.000150262,0.00001716186,0.001805045,0.0007020356,0.00008064345,0.001706439,0.007276957,0.0005336051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897307,0.0001684356,0.005405588,0.0001763797,0.0001916559,0.001599239,0.00009187429,0.00007254825,0.002563549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561284,0.001490244,0.03878654,0.0004772217,0.00003491103,0.0001740891,0.0002698643,0.00003621844,0.002602515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2967615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01648672904747784,"score_gpt":0.2768632252672577,"score_spread":0.2603764962197799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}