{"id":"W2059578613","doi":"10.1897/ieam_2009-016.1","title":"A risk-ranking methodology for prioritizing historic, potentially contaminated mine sites in British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Agriculture; Government of British Columbia; SNC-Lavalin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Christian ministry; Human health; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Computer science; Business; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003565891,0.001114229,0.0008111641,0.007145495,0.001593767,0.002937453,0.001704346,0.0007367732,0.002803976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009432364,0.0004680645,0.0006590824,0.004911804,0.0006002803,0.0007137872,0.001510618,0.0008120593,0.000249997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008063338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01280586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4515475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5314245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965366,0.001074529,0.0003718251,0.0004648837,0.001127634,0.0004244875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950211,0.002069261,0.0005210788,0.0001594596,0.002016969,0.0002122009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004451152,0.0003681156,0.1204201,0.001193677,0.0003982123,0.001518299,0.002326003,0.4543422,0.007143716,0.00996266,0.01009967,0.3917822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001153705,0.0002960243,0.06540201,0.0002580945,0.0001880479,0.0004034478,0.004148724,0.8993481,0.003834437,0.01239098,0.01345001,0.0001648488],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5377281,0.001596258,0.4288159,0.001339777,0.00006406735,0.002599132,0.004641145,0.001164775,0.02205096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.719866,0.0003741165,0.271417,0.0001125649,0.00002057904,0.0006434508,0.002612051,0.00006325468,0.004890974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5484525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8978385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01648672904747784,"score_gpt":0.2768632252672577,"score_spread":0.2603764962197799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}