{"id":"W2059753047","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2001.tb00326.x","title":"Private Insurance Company Involvement in the U.S. Crop Insurance Program","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediary; Transaction cost; Politics; Business; Insurance policy; Private information retrieval; Crop insurance; Information asymmetry; Value (mathematics); Key person insurance; Finance; Public economics; Economics; Agriculture","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005821031,0.0004106893,0.0006097588,0.00008546345,0.0004636406,0.0003415085,0.001518025,0.0001751059,0.0001736359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006835854,0.0001492331,0.000318841,0.0005890005,0.0002234064,0.0007420956,0.00003605044,0.0005480925,0.000044839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008269027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000153955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04488362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9110968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971444,0.0001273154,0.001097861,0.0004442939,0.00004759623,0.001138557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977722,0.0001817187,0.0007031164,0.0001513822,0.0001994412,0.0009921608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001044057,0.0001890709,0.9113255,0.00002880761,0.0001069291,0.0004084188,0.002635581,0.004546411,0.001459907,0.00472558,0.003478646,0.07099073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003510973,0.0004915971,0.9173582,0.00007493452,0.00001215758,0.00077899,0.002386704,0.00001853327,0.00005221012,0.0005313176,0.07754115,0.0004031034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894311,0.0007567781,1.981872e-7,0.007481348,0.000782111,0.0006413966,0.0001188983,0.00001665651,0.0007715568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997331,0.0006447642,0.00006414597,0.0007617187,0.0008946753,0.00004207071,0.00005660539,0.000003310651,0.0002016616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8662131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9614766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02466325983271376,"score_gpt":0.1842812859784355,"score_spread":0.1596180261457217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}