{"id":"W2059764265","doi":"10.1007/s001990100207","title":"Subjective ambiguity, expected utility and Choquet expected utility","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Axiom; Choquet integral; Expected utility hypothesis; Subjective expected utility; Mathematical economics; Decision maker; Simple (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Key (lock); Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy logic; Operations research; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009624621,0.001218027,0.002053823,0.002319442,0.0008974672,0.006251077,0.001431717,0.00368,0.004072179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04881882,0.0007023872,0.0009658916,0.003179052,0.007014957,0.01114861,0.002074401,0.002944982,0.000310615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001944149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001089871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001051054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007777765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941269,0.003581501,0.00030019,0.0004973007,0.001193907,0.0003002842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662267,0.02839309,0.002063772,0.001057736,0.001597476,0.0006612749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003744968,0.00002614349,0.0005170844,0.0001119644,0.00003435406,0.00004632169,0.000251481,0.004454136,0.0001015249,0.9886836,0.0003531936,0.005382712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007536455,0.0000111383,0.0002604191,0.00002499376,0.00001123631,0.00002698363,0.00005579594,0.007135546,0.00002660402,0.9919423,0.0004846875,0.00001275871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1395367,0.03502795,0.7452074,0.01033266,0.0007448928,0.0001146921,0.0002743597,0.00006482252,0.06869653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9354097,0.008468409,0.04944567,0.0004389927,0.0009582823,0.0001689299,0.0001215139,0.00002967353,0.004958856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009624621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05090046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1413879575522868,"score_gpt":0.3580277843269509,"score_spread":0.2166398267746641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}