{"id":"W2059885779","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00517.x","title":"Local Influence Diagnostics for Quasi‐Likelihood and Lognormal Estimates of a Biological Reference Point from Some Fish Stock and Recruitment Models","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Statistics; Econometrics; Maximum likelihood; Mathematics; Point estimation; Log-normal distribution; Fish stock; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Biology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002286875,0.0001330931,0.00020562,0.0001497576,0.00007354262,0.00003913745,0.0001677123,0.0001246771,0.0001139877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003702429,0.0001069835,0.000024107,0.000616641,0.0004471798,0.0002239359,0.0004646136,0.00008647097,0.000002319448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005751877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001152418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003109279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000937436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988291,0.000024634,0.0002585676,0.0003269961,0.0002564394,0.0003042513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989006,0.0007183863,0.00007639054,0.0001600891,0.00002890728,0.0001156193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000135592,0.0005216743,0.741403,0.00006060499,0.00002084025,0.00001112832,0.00007592252,0.0002560186,0.002087041,0.001356433,0.001688325,0.2523835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001497474,0.002374851,0.8596972,0.00002334955,0.00003713571,0.000008352244,0.0001187471,0.06461401,0.0033057,0.05590162,0.01188288,0.0005386456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641007,0.0002675428,0.03351459,0.000146835,0.00002261709,0.0005588969,0.0002975785,0.00002038418,0.001070885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878379,0.001059265,0.0108135,0.00009330226,0.00001727163,0.00007912566,0.00006799849,0.000008026394,0.00002368453],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2518448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4700321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08661601775271577,"score_gpt":0.2936057962063864,"score_spread":0.2069897784536706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}