{"id":"W2060020031","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.706-709.1685","title":"Residual Strain Distribution around a Fatigue-Crack Tip Determined by Neutron Diffraction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Materials science forum","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Materials science; Crack closure; Residual stress; Crack tip opening displacement; Neutron diffraction; Composite material; Tension (geology); Crack growth resistance curve; Diffraction; Plasticity; Paris' law; Structural engineering; Fracture mechanics; Compression (physics); Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001875047,0.0001698292,0.0002695334,0.0004969515,0.0002005174,0.0002327321,0.0002172507,0.0003329104,0.0007912099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000298823,0.0001813041,0.00008691389,0.0002738569,0.0004220146,0.0002415599,0.0001794607,0.0001974887,0.0002101969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000263274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001712254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002576948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004201753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999017,0.000007401692,0.000007006478,0.00002352881,0.00004394515,0.0000163498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997552,0.00004244791,0.00004971484,0.00002350437,0.0001031498,0.0000261103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005385135,0.00001037413,0.002360031,0.00002247206,0.00000239383,0.00005250524,0.00005763923,0.000428677,0.9955797,0.0000829462,0.00002055497,0.001328893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001693697,0.0003322069,0.1256749,0.00002239149,0.00002200465,0.0006173491,0.0003166078,0.01432874,0.8571531,0.0001298966,0.001357693,0.00002820053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968289,0.0001950516,0.001899867,0.00001015261,0.00000303809,0.00000482511,0.000122362,0.00001683529,0.0009189813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967436,0.0001372106,0.002303799,0.000009100356,0.000001631215,0.00000720921,0.0002298722,0.000007887412,0.0005598117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002576948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005123913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01512083115910133,"score_gpt":0.2422580469708328,"score_spread":0.2271372158117314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}