{"id":"W2060117754","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2014.07.004","title":"A decision-support tool to facilitate discussion of no-take boundaries for Marine Protected Areas during stakeholder consultation processes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Marine protected area; Vulnerability (computing); Environmental resource management; Boundary (topology); Trawling; Marine spatial planning; Government (linguistics); Business; Environmental planning; Computer science; Environmental science; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004971127,0.0001478823,0.0002297183,0.00006888915,0.0005700694,0.0001052071,0.000119105,0.00009536602,0.00009274272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005489737,0.00009325645,0.00006869938,0.0002564148,0.0000576112,0.0003763501,0.0001009753,0.0001560984,0.00001097845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001017537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006630134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003843829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007424915,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987785,0.00002440857,0.0004754824,0.0002198987,0.0002983208,0.0002033591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987339,0.0002538698,0.0003282144,0.0001095759,0.000506177,0.00006830876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01341692,0.000555174,0.2771123,0.004056811,0.0002749717,0.00000580371,0.006273433,0.0005097465,0.09261794,0.0008083607,0.1536102,0.4507583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002448924,0.0008890668,0.4378559,0.0002704017,0.00005834741,0.00003711775,0.0002377769,0.001324663,0.004297775,0.008376624,0.5438431,0.0003603274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671858,0.00001316115,0.02735436,0.00278125,0.0006681084,0.001735576,0.00007143046,0.00002980405,0.0001604818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700754,0.0000121486,0.02118964,0.0003226004,0.0001712389,0.0003642783,0.00006963947,0.00002274414,0.007772284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.450398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6572124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02590761745429456,"score_gpt":0.251811893341068,"score_spread":0.2259042758867734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}