{"id":"W2060188826","doi":"10.3182/20060906-3-it-2910.00015","title":"AN OPTIMAL CONTROL APPROACH TO STABLE-PUSHING PLANNING","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFAC Proceedings Volumes","topic":"Robotic Path Planning Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Control theory (sociology); Trajectory; Object (grammar); Constant (computer programming); Optimal control; Robot; Control (management); RADIUS; Motion planning; Turning radius; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006691163,0.000324878,0.0003697829,0.0002710293,0.0003464213,0.001123928,0.001571908,0.0001304715,0.000002705022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008277637,0.0003284776,0.00006588719,0.0006515497,0.00004632972,0.001935656,0.0001810027,0.0002932685,0.00005512929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009956877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006753128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001297986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.355046e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971963,0.0000193922,0.0003935616,0.0009164538,0.000602896,0.0008714393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989384,0.00004863408,0.0001648831,0.0003301185,0.0002289993,0.0002889512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001324521,0.00109938,0.1104993,0.0002123125,0.0001418105,0.0001190977,0.01717425,0.735507,0.02640469,0.04495209,0.03999256,0.02376509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006154836,0.0001953795,0.01630995,0.00006313284,0.0000142365,0.00008546578,0.0003471167,0.9783257,0.001136182,0.0004263428,0.00192796,0.0005530613],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09907029,0.0001408282,0.8862053,0.0002850856,0.0002560522,0.0003658383,0.000006140518,0.0009575931,0.01271293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5230004,2.081593e-7,0.4761937,0.0002318869,0.0002678374,0.00004558805,0.000004434929,0.00002282983,0.000233122],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4239301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01323248907806751,"score_gpt":0.2416194817586733,"score_spread":0.2283869926806058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}