{"id":"W2060285671","doi":"10.1364/ao.41.006307","title":"Multiple-scattering lidar retrieval method: tests on Monte Carlo simulations and comparisons with in situ measurements","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Optics","topic":"Atmospheric aerosols and clouds","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Lidar; Monte Carlo method; Remote sensing; Scattering; Environmental science; Aerosol; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Mie scattering; Molar absorptivity; Wavelength; Meteorology; Optics; Computational physics; Light scattering; Physics; Statistics; Geology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001065142,0.0001484448,0.0001608475,0.000002931644,0.0001417305,0.00002890003,0.0001028229,0.00005691765,0.00009133224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002209155,0.0001301554,0.00001404644,0.0002072502,0.0000887587,0.00005047943,0.00008211788,0.0001499982,0.00004718201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002305463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006825299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004386586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990094,0.00001764101,0.000167286,0.0002813603,0.0002878604,0.0002364812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995198,0.0001223146,0.0000584741,0.0002050833,0.00000491458,0.00008944381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001095186,0.0002976246,0.531881,0.000008340958,0.00002589855,0.000008885839,0.001840055,0.4238437,0.03743641,0.00005773551,0.0002113043,0.004279545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002831443,0.0003453217,0.500291,0.00005450091,0.00006403943,0.000006739253,0.0007004615,0.4864899,0.007564614,0.00005133166,0.0008778874,0.0007227787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867577,0.00001899433,0.003550708,0.00009629211,0.00001859587,0.0002539628,0.000002701191,0.00002861981,0.009272438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9365337,0.000005217308,0.06315667,0.0001615217,0.00001408356,0.000007231342,0.000001130669,0.00001780296,0.0001026361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06264617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5307585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03930960218440544,"score_gpt":0.2544976234076426,"score_spread":0.2151880212232372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}