{"id":"W2060300478","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.039","title":"Towards the inclusion of gender and sex in health research and funding: An institutional perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Sex and Gender in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; Institute of Gender and Health","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada; National Institutes of Health; National Medical Research Council; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation","keywords":"Funding Agency; Agency (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Health policy; Public health; Sociology; Gender studies; Economic growth; Public relations; Medicine; Social science; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2223555,0.0008268578,0.002276409,0.005681339,0.0139583,0.03790185,0.0053066,0.02468455,0.004560883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1875873,0.00121647,0.001505947,0.005906909,0.1125225,0.04075725,0.02755217,0.02141308,0.0002669511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01909019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06491955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01862361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0212198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8165399,0.1480557,0.004924285,0.00455021,0.01468534,0.01124455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6509185,0.2726699,0.01817949,0.01842663,0.02291842,0.01688719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001963457,0.00002391637,0.001097624,0.0000640211,0.00002381795,0.00005957488,0.009459296,0.0001470353,0.00007169024,0.9814814,0.002243532,0.005308447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006200919,0.00005078889,0.001906235,0.0010436,0.00008321687,0.0001168102,0.0253191,0.0004625481,0.0003028415,0.912734,0.05785553,0.00006332327],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03219673,0.01143549,0.02271198,0.8449934,0.002367436,0.0000720457,0.00006951307,0.00004704921,0.08610645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9029086,0.005165004,0.008135679,0.0750218,0.003659863,0.0002492708,0.00003548251,0.00007048502,0.004753852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7776445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9589741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5019425865984019,"score_gpt":0.522048272358659,"score_spread":0.02010568576025717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}