{"id":"W2060302835","doi":"10.1002/aic.10039","title":"On the activity of ions and the junction potential: Revised values for all data","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIChE Journal","topic":"Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions","field":"Chemical Engineering","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Xunta de Galicia","keywords":"Ion; Electrolyte; Work (physics); Calibration; Sign (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Thermodynamics; Chemistry; Activity coefficient; Electrode; Statistical physics; Mathematics; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Statistics; Physical chemistry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004382915,0.001222622,0.001155649,0.001779008,0.0003808115,0.002248983,0.003231014,0.0009387397,0.003679547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03062558,0.0004610261,0.0008329028,0.001477868,0.0007346713,0.003893676,0.0009328551,0.002209375,0.002195094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000899734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008603508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001153043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001309477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959639,0.001013005,0.0005440239,0.0004884811,0.001834243,0.0001563129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890881,0.003553599,0.000708542,0.002823479,0.003719146,0.0001071212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009544893,0.0003172529,0.01024462,0.001921211,0.0005531451,0.001829678,0.0004193761,0.06876054,0.2095952,0.1090911,0.0259618,0.5703516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007195251,0.0005188779,0.006735113,0.0002115838,0.0003674202,0.002092504,0.0001520991,0.2806008,0.5728683,0.03079974,0.1052724,0.0003093352],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1444043,0.01136957,0.8132579,0.002183258,0.003480415,0.0002839052,0.002377613,0.003601565,0.01904145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5513808,0.01062625,0.4157968,0.0008284794,0.000590959,0.0002430352,0.003336667,0.001072222,0.01612483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004382915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02317929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04328030237723415,"score_gpt":0.2735853151964223,"score_spread":0.2303050128191881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}