{"id":"W2060362003","doi":"10.1139/y2012-002","title":"Dunn’s index for cluster tendency assessment of pharmacological data sets","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","topic":"Computational Drug Discovery Methods","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cluster (spacecraft); Partition (number theory); Measure (data warehouse); Index (typography); Linkage (software); Diagonal; Pattern recognition (psychology); Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Combinatorics; Chemistry; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02589588,0.001338592,0.002898576,0.01167757,0.002172949,0.002644558,0.002310673,0.001525666,0.003467544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1010592,0.0005334947,0.003100463,0.01038024,0.002425047,0.002775176,0.001998268,0.003670897,0.0008492623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001738365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002827859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002076645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002471152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9689325,0.01306482,0.005213223,0.003742351,0.008478872,0.000568201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9184248,0.05613269,0.005701209,0.007605647,0.0109594,0.001176168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003899364,0.0007882267,0.164934,0.004815862,0.006563979,0.001199809,0.003828319,0.07471818,0.02294026,0.07181879,0.04775418,0.5967391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005417878,0.005304174,0.226051,0.001033219,0.001574068,0.002742833,0.003147514,0.4717019,0.04034623,0.1425068,0.1033426,0.001707852],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1207751,0.00486739,0.8498017,0.0007990356,0.001428926,0.002496145,0.007579857,0.00284958,0.009402159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4227969,0.0006840141,0.5656189,0.0002068043,0.000260468,0.003646013,0.004574636,0.0004795455,0.001732756],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02589588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1369522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07568724633396753,"score_gpt":0.4144943545782127,"score_spread":0.3388071082442451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}