{"id":"W2060450146","doi":"10.1186/s12885-015-1206-0","title":"Lack of a protective effect of cotton dust on risk of lung cancer: evidence from two population-based case-control studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Cancer","topic":"Occupational and environmental lung diseases","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"The Quebec Population Health Research Network; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; McGill University Health Centre; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Medicine; Lung cancer; Odds ratio; Confounding; Confidence interval; Case-control study; Logistic regression; Population; Demography; Cancer; Environmental health; Asbestos; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001678246,0.0001163291,0.0004101894,0.00004531274,0.00002195955,0.000001153584,0.00003565066,0.0000321383,0.00008492171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005205561,0.00008368148,0.00009849896,0.00009046362,0.00008754036,0.00004377156,0.00001267929,0.00006394211,0.000001337881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003309375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001559901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04481174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00281682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990358,0.0001401819,0.0002420229,0.0001721721,0.0003253273,0.00008443338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986413,0.0007334446,0.0002921174,0.0001604246,0.0001051757,0.00006757658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006692386,0.00007113111,0.9677713,0.0005367362,0.0003176628,0.000006471833,0.0001880059,0.02256566,0.0007217942,0.000001772077,0.0001563588,0.0009707123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004036267,0.000796139,0.9736521,0.001779059,0.00120403,9.222761e-7,0.00007212898,0.005733008,0.01262088,0.00002515659,0.000003563212,0.00007680888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870416,0.01086924,0.00005523139,0.00006000721,0.0000933335,0.0009100526,0.0009485125,0.000008575704,0.00001346019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993592,0.0001093754,0.00008722846,0.0000364958,0.0001161658,0.0002407368,0.00001298347,0.00001071855,0.00002711207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04199491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9615489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06470229453905912,"score_gpt":0.3952637595729389,"score_spread":0.3305614650338797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}