{"id":"W2060521822","doi":"10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.018","title":"Semantic ambiguity and the failure of inhibition hypothesis as an explanation for reading errors in deep dyslexia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brain and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Dissociation (chemistry); Ambiguity; Lexical access; Lexical decision task; Dyslexia; Cognitive psychology; Language disorder; Reading (process); Contrast (vision); Linguistics; Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001874226,0.0008116373,0.0006717924,0.001947381,0.0003020338,0.001578995,0.001177462,0.00205344,0.004743486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01731455,0.0003709309,0.0005091762,0.0006440265,0.002559703,0.002828016,0.001207,0.001544033,0.0004584206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003656233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007027428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007204236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004137813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991239,0.0001882936,0.0001633192,0.0001473537,0.0002493293,0.0001279431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868601,0.008816534,0.002325841,0.001073545,0.0005739132,0.0003501875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005705379,0.001805897,0.5524884,0.0007735609,0.0005274965,0.05257394,0.007745435,0.01238546,0.1335261,0.1038053,0.004820633,0.1238424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000885656,0.0009893341,0.3901717,0.0001715444,0.0005825449,0.07840292,0.004377299,0.06655803,0.04369936,0.4109223,0.002975121,0.0002641814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809498,0.0004579888,0.009690993,0.002481145,0.0001209851,0.0000293492,0.0001665091,0.0002254041,0.005877655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979706,0.00006632882,0.001309632,0.0001372618,0.0000384114,0.000008317606,0.00004425908,0.00003784832,0.0003873135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004743486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01586854,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02096095434836217,"score_gpt":0.2878377484679893,"score_spread":0.2668767941196271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}