{"id":"W2060556149","doi":"10.1007/s10044-008-0111-4","title":"On Bayesian analysis of a finite generalized Dirichlet mixture via a Metropolis-within-Gibbs sampling","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pattern Analysis and Applications","topic":"Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Dirichlet distribution; Gibbs sampling; Conjugate prior; Mathematics; Hierarchical Dirichlet process; Metropolis–Hastings algorithm; Generalized Dirichlet distribution; Latent Dirichlet allocation; Kernel (algebra); Applied mathematics; Bayesian probability; Pattern recognition (psychology); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Statistics; Posterior probability; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Topic model; Dirichlet's energy; Combinatorics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009303449,0.001688648,0.003208715,0.00308084,0.00144265,0.003825674,0.005073182,0.003149145,0.006340688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03960447,0.002091165,0.003236444,0.003368174,0.004955398,0.005962346,0.005040208,0.004771836,0.00113081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002623005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002886648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01175866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01166346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953294,0.002976868,0.0001759108,0.0005533827,0.0007247223,0.0002396506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748396,0.02181442,0.0006676409,0.001006879,0.001221164,0.0004502757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001004543,0.00007077984,0.0008698853,0.0001957125,0.0001516526,0.0000948853,0.0002805822,0.3430685,0.0008660107,0.6193283,0.002156778,0.03281647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001113594,0.000006926572,0.0001168497,0.00001908691,0.00001617864,0.00001826225,0.00001313676,0.8041118,0.0001562323,0.1948724,0.0006365671,0.00002139295],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002443293,0.0002605646,0.9963561,0.0001635301,0.00002794087,0.00002293973,0.00003964383,0.00008552147,0.0006004039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1982345,0.002132795,0.7881059,0.0005268853,0.0004834405,0.0005927683,0.000837294,0.0007584359,0.008327939],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01175866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04920197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02449743636263198,"score_gpt":0.2922775395972536,"score_spread":0.2677801032346216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}