{"id":"W2060584171","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.10.003","title":"Examining the economic impact of park facilities on neighboring residential property values","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Geography","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Property value; Geography; Residential property; Property (philosophy); Economic impact analysis; Urban park; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Business; Regional science; Civil engineering; Environmental science; Engineering; Ecology; Real estate; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008432528,0.0002226841,0.0002437787,0.0009319125,0.0002705124,0.001491342,0.0004492064,0.0004342741,0.005537346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008716702,0.000165786,0.0004981302,0.002045005,0.0005680787,0.00142517,0.0007598795,0.0008014308,0.0002163294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009105444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005239624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01702943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02985932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994778,0.0002784157,0.00001917729,0.00005778291,0.00006626107,0.0001005623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928111,0.00521533,0.0009025933,0.0002795092,0.0003621365,0.0004292317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004679642,0.0004890712,0.9108471,0.00005121692,0.000366288,0.0006172899,0.0002320426,0.05811971,0.0008086841,0.01273772,0.0005766865,0.01468615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003729891,0.0003892018,0.8942734,0.00002586741,0.0003059257,0.0001842955,0.003116123,0.08816839,0.0008408161,0.01074561,0.001887259,0.00002583162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971184,0.00007231422,0.0004462932,0.00009322375,0.000002978301,0.00000417277,0.0001386639,0.000002179402,0.002121864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993945,0.00005475874,0.0001107604,0.000004055297,0.000003691187,0.000001610414,0.0001005602,0.0000010505,0.0003289274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01702943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03386062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06000329181777065,"score_gpt":0.2068379469982845,"score_spread":0.1468346551805139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}