{"id":"W2060590541","doi":"10.1109/csmr-wcre.2014.6747194","title":"Improving the detection accuracy of evolutionary coupling by measuring change correspondence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; False positive paradox; Association (psychology); Coupling (piping); Association rule learning; Code (set theory); Subject (documents); Coupling strength; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Programming language; Psychology; Engineering; Set (abstract data type)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007651758,0.00007515893,0.00007433421,0.00008108895,0.0001237136,0.00005457418,0.0007787077,0.00003515282,0.000007315593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002317104,0.00005637236,0.00003064274,0.0003721887,0.00003282208,0.0004764722,0.0002809597,0.0001535236,0.00001790701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005775889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002762517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002609561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000589871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989843,0.00003310027,0.0001345115,0.0002131582,0.0004175912,0.0002173459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976154,0.00169946,0.00005962707,0.0004611188,0.0001194333,0.00004497667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002487484,0.00006323092,0.01302565,0.000141299,0.00002352065,0.000002186364,0.0009410352,0.004446332,0.4730852,0.002966553,0.0007358825,0.5045443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008574693,0.00004436545,0.02229912,0.00002031167,0.000001360486,0.00000730288,0.00001149678,0.9306269,0.04630212,0.00005721394,0.0004603616,0.00008371739],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1083595,0.0002683552,0.8906029,0.0001247777,0.0002794285,0.0001332091,3.641206e-7,0.0002025534,0.00002885527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955404,0.000006815546,0.004229233,0.00003700741,0.00007072913,0.00003282035,2.431749e-7,0.000007190811,0.0000755182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9261805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2773958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03268844191966239,"score_gpt":0.2500062749179257,"score_spread":0.2173178329982633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}