{"id":"W2060703261","doi":"10.1007/s10530-010-9819-3","title":"Evaluation of the Australian weed risk assessment system for the prediction of plant invasiveness in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Invasions","topic":"Biological Control of Invasive Species","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Emissions Reduction Alberta","funders":"Nature Conservancy; Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Biology; Weed; Hardiness (plants); Invasive species; Minor (academic); Risk assessment; Ecology; Agronomy; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003871266,0.0007651071,0.0005524389,0.0009274671,0.001121198,0.001364228,0.001011301,0.0005913111,0.0009975794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008887167,0.0002861592,0.0004110462,0.0008288579,0.0003425742,0.0005008968,0.000674589,0.000477139,0.0001865928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01128241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01075551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9494677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.937307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988637,0.0003358572,0.00008099233,0.0001601574,0.0004625001,0.00009683459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945518,0.002053452,0.0002774049,0.0001213551,0.002696487,0.0002994234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003536121,0.001071449,0.5063659,0.0002873752,0.0005625278,0.0003932999,0.001078215,0.3134786,0.008503266,0.001406698,0.004252588,0.1590639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001620379,0.0004371909,0.174964,0.00003003326,0.0001666231,0.00005315596,0.0004071111,0.8202317,0.001938429,0.0002419685,0.001309197,0.00005864334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920714,0.0001382769,0.004373896,0.0002525951,0.00001232357,0.0001722713,0.0006971814,0.0001860166,0.002096015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881269,0.0001060543,0.009433985,0.00005663295,0.000003700784,0.00005125038,0.0008161778,0.00001512861,0.001390121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05053228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1016597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2099981440173019,"score_gpt":0.2637840442750673,"score_spread":0.05378590025776539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}