{"id":"W2060726649","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1311.6462","title":"The Inverse Iteration Method for Julia Sets in the 3-Dimensional Space","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Julia set; Inverse; Mathematics; Boundary (topology); Cartesian coordinate system; Cartesian product; Space (punctuation); Polynomial; Set (abstract data type); Pure mathematics; Algebra over a field; Mathematical analysis; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001364352,0.0002548567,0.0003069816,0.00008552505,0.0002325871,0.0001399807,0.00065176,0.0002614986,0.00005687046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005088889,0.0001660818,0.0002285563,0.0001808712,0.00008351904,0.0001013259,0.0003649176,0.0004981312,0.00004894082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001009784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007278831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000748005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003652565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985545,0.000312823,0.000282541,0.0004447765,0.00011917,0.0002861953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955327,0.003187452,0.0002900603,0.0007719438,0.0001529509,0.00006488487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003191812,0.0001106114,0.00003405488,0.0001850226,0.00006066094,0.00001688649,0.0005177478,0.006763075,0.00001847166,0.9822551,0.009842052,0.0001644208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001836931,0.00001379782,0.0000344043,0.0000477075,0.00005425011,0.000001673716,0.0001393706,0.4712133,0.000005431262,0.5272561,0.0009330598,0.0001172274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4211915,0.00003403885,0.5668818,0.002391599,0.0005018185,0.003053454,0.00008878938,0.00008266992,0.005774317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9253147,0.00007006185,0.0647148,0.0004932284,0.0001286387,0.0000416428,0.00007394038,0.0000625014,0.009100473],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5041232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6772621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.130026155169805,"score_gpt":0.2667902318986241,"score_spread":0.136764076728819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}