{"id":"W2060732555","doi":"10.3758/bf03212067","title":"Constrained scaling: The effect of learned psychophysical scales on idiosyncratic response bias","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perception & Psychophysics","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Loudness; Psychology; Magnitude (astronomy); Audiology; Scaling; Contrast (vision); Amplitude; Psychophysics; Response bias; Scale (ratio); Mathematics; Perception; Statistics; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Optics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001957014,0.000593812,0.0006018792,0.000254274,0.0002719137,0.001054804,0.0007864641,0.0005922209,0.003153417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03873203,0.0005335448,0.0003711248,0.0003568153,0.0007152683,0.001181716,0.00144459,0.001471615,0.000360593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003447179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004586468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008227834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008261572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987759,0.0003487559,0.00008894417,0.0003725369,0.000317206,0.00009670518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822005,0.01020492,0.001674257,0.004659313,0.0007230946,0.0005378666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003445414,0.0007675722,0.02047849,0.0004200838,0.0003771893,0.0002059107,0.0004839688,0.03316161,0.7956695,0.008206914,0.00117945,0.1356039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004239306,0.001403919,0.421227,0.0001376667,0.0004479396,0.00111048,0.0001581037,0.3625238,0.1719442,0.03732259,0.002985927,0.0003143037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.869381,0.0004268458,0.1241365,0.0001734483,0.0001088136,0.0001318111,0.0002531997,0.0006271995,0.004761193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843926,0.0001029869,0.01399213,0.0001355874,0.00003064441,0.00005333431,0.0001587444,0.0004970904,0.0006368312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003153417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01054925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06239543175574407,"score_gpt":0.3557803565662411,"score_spread":0.293384924810497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}