{"id":"W2060821931","doi":"10.1016/j.cose.2013.03.010","title":"A framework for risk assessment in access control systems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Security","topic":"Information and Cyber Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Access control; Context (archaeology); Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Situation awareness; Computer security; Object (grammar); Judgement; Security controls; Control (management); Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006330272,0.0002063357,0.0003287953,0.0001611013,0.0001699009,0.001306161,0.001570105,0.0001406298,0.00001535134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005956399,0.0001938893,0.0001157178,0.0003685353,0.00003683916,0.002088304,0.0003257568,0.0004377817,0.00005859361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001285037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001033517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005234192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000240131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981785,0.0001846123,0.0004996507,0.0003785112,0.0002989571,0.0004598002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982378,0.0004625068,0.0002680122,0.0006430698,0.000228945,0.0001596216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008979129,0.000215971,0.007989399,0.0001260871,0.00004529106,0.000004305341,0.003839892,0.002423454,0.000002260508,0.9612485,0.01152132,0.01257459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001050069,0.00006031473,0.02538842,0.00006197945,0.000004962695,0.000004517384,0.00005772199,0.8708763,0.000007956615,0.09751545,0.004720089,0.0002522674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02633991,0.00009924626,0.9676877,0.001606758,0.001860677,0.001387521,0.00001546155,0.0002126322,0.0007900593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957297,0.00001402634,0.04080222,0.001414902,0.0001290724,0.0003229152,0.000006595172,0.000008129258,0.000005189745],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.930957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01453819173413204,"score_gpt":0.2907338934811638,"score_spread":0.2761957017470318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}