{"id":"W2060919269","doi":"10.1300/j104v32n02_06","title":"Standardization, Objectivity, and User Focus: A Meta-Analysis of Subject Access Critiques","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cataloging & Classification Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Standardization; Subject access; Subject (documents); Sociology; Diversity (politics); Metadata; Computer science; Information access; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Adaptation (eye); Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009764713,0.0001066239,0.0003526539,0.000322556,0.0003888139,0.0004480885,0.0002974671,0.00007595433,0.0001732634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001345479,0.00009499753,0.0002001588,0.001693204,0.0003660336,0.002634308,0.00001332913,0.00006192829,0.000003521946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003691208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002131574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001054736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003962409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984558,0.0002872225,0.000324662,0.0003407187,0.0003981317,0.0001934426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989539,0.0002110232,0.0002371629,0.0002688763,0.0002325419,0.00009652493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009256536,0.0005553772,0.318441,0.00006415122,0.01869007,0.00001486328,0.1210792,0.0001320479,0.005098923,0.4983313,0.003310762,0.03418973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005523791,0.0006081839,0.8104629,0.00001787886,0.04700422,0.000005846433,0.06180401,0.00210571,0.002986915,0.03072403,0.0426118,0.001116142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.758659,0.0008668419,0.1992456,0.02080526,0.0002159076,0.0008724908,0.0002316752,0.0003768804,0.01872627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989527,0.00007561755,0.000257712,0.0001220222,0.00004263297,0.00002985165,0.00008725499,0.000005654502,0.0004265597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4920219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4320928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1428925735238676,"score_gpt":0.3937206243957861,"score_spread":0.2508280508719185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}