{"id":"W2060919269","doi":"10.1300/j104v32n02_06","title":"Standardization, Objectivity, and User Focus: A Meta-Analysis of Subject Access Critiques","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cataloging & Classification Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Standardization; Subject access; Subject (documents); Sociology; Diversity (politics); Metadata; Computer science; Information access; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Adaptation (eye); Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3751285,0.002225608,0.007047941,0.03298096,0.002095489,0.008155269,0.003844463,0.001898343,0.003078899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6275584,0.001827095,0.01231436,0.02327416,0.006319195,0.006507675,0.005097678,0.001740229,0.0001575925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00936949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01052262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005754427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009648991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6137881,0.2901523,0.05368489,0.009879229,0.0311488,0.001346643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1551244,0.7697068,0.03276605,0.01893495,0.02270792,0.0007598108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003960235,0.0002822856,0.07498919,0.2715892,0.4058659,0.0006809739,0.09200566,0.001022183,0.001245061,0.006526021,0.003174807,0.1386586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002230025,0.002310982,0.0720514,0.2242997,0.6214164,0.0006169656,0.03707213,0.002440157,0.004678899,0.01155958,0.02087605,0.0004476489],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4281885,0.5028408,0.03998426,0.005713664,0.001129492,0.009604982,0.003039305,0.0003849996,0.009114022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525084,0.0277447,0.01344741,0.0007967363,0.0002153642,0.003971062,0.0007882696,0.0001647088,0.000363227],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6248715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7705778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1428925735238676,"score_gpt":0.3937206243957861,"score_spread":0.2508280508719185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}