{"id":"W2061023584","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.001","title":"The effectiveness of focused instruction of formulaic sequences in augmenting L2 learners' academic writing skills: A quantitative research study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic writing; Task (project management); Computer science; Second language writing; Second-language acquisition; English for academic purposes; Mathematics education; Empirical research; Language proficiency; Phenomenon; Function (biology); Linguistics; Second language; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01992993,0.0001391091,0.0004704714,0.0006395425,0.000136181,0.00002255192,0.0005151026,0.0002563267,0.00003934875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01577071,0.0001031036,0.0001365813,0.000689091,0.0002325639,0.0005058049,0.00007012649,0.002046664,0.000001164727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001511466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001788968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007504613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008926934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949078,0.002624689,0.001242769,0.0002059434,0.0006211058,0.0003977024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899551,0.007036274,0.001134901,0.000149255,0.001633297,0.00009115459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01584014,0.001172746,0.2949662,0.000806483,0.001426678,0.0001138542,0.5520066,0.002665233,0.0235999,0.0286619,0.001165701,0.07757455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01086346,0.004110863,0.04607671,0.001545791,0.0001035917,0.0000680807,0.9240684,0.0001240128,0.00606908,0.005256663,0.001472087,0.0002412544],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989393,0.007785005,0.0001102884,0.00003575168,0.001028948,0.0007284062,0.000005148401,0.00001101227,0.000902441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991627,0.00007376669,0.0002292901,0.00002110876,0.0003948653,0.0000490714,0.000001817503,0.00002187156,0.00004546142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3720618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0930799240018794,"score_gpt":0.4491424654386306,"score_spread":0.3560625414367512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}