{"id":"W2061063625","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.012","title":"A practical approach for assessing the sensitivity of the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector (CBM-CFS3)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Modelling","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Sensitivity (control systems); Environmental science; Initialization; Scale (ratio); Biomass (ecology); Ridge; Soil science; Econometrics; Computer science; Atmospheric sciences; Ecology; Mathematics; Geology; Biology; Physics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008898914,0.0009772857,0.0005893824,0.002707796,0.002378839,0.002540796,0.001751959,0.002059846,0.007357052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04421633,0.0005563853,0.000886954,0.00248216,0.00147229,0.001799918,0.002580611,0.002586428,0.0003235568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008040384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01508922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4247914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3873814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945624,0.002268076,0.0001705314,0.0004249086,0.002086029,0.0004880346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912548,0.005495808,0.0003867927,0.0007375872,0.001900816,0.0002242071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002496409,0.0002371425,0.01026878,0.0002080075,0.0001792596,0.0003021701,0.0004513337,0.7923195,0.004026351,0.1358735,0.005859531,0.05002493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009932672,0.0002117958,0.005002272,0.0000756952,0.00005136487,0.0001035863,0.0007185439,0.9273682,0.001899134,0.05775272,0.006632399,0.000085087],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2634587,0.0003629136,0.6422201,0.004282202,0.0002196129,0.001696483,0.003194029,0.0009468626,0.08361911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7272723,0.0001385572,0.267268,0.0004298719,0.00002848549,0.0005259606,0.000767999,0.0001357001,0.00343313],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4247914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8446376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08533730176396662,"score_gpt":0.2695061913481138,"score_spread":0.1841688895841471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}